It sure does have something to do with today's situation. This is a man who influenced many people and outright called on all Arabs to murder Jews where they stand. Given, in the larger context of the Holocaust, he was a marginal figure with very little influence, but his influence in the Arab world was strong and his legacy remains.
Uhm... that is just like throwing "yes" and "no" at eachother. The actions Muhammad Al-Husseini have no influene on the situation that is given today. Of course they had great influence further back in time but in the situation given today there is no way that it has an influence. Israel is in power, the Palestinians can't do ****. Maybe you want to explain in what way it affects todays situation, bro
?
Nazis did indeed start out with blaming Jews for the problems of the failures of the state. Hitler used his own Christianity and Nationalism to easily persuade a suffering public to blame the Jews for their problems. The genocide was only a stone's throw away once the ground work was laid out in the beginning.
I guess yoou should read what I actually wrote. Here is what I said: "The comparison of Israel to the agenda of the Nazi state is very equal. Nazi-Germany
didn't start out by killing Jews from the beggining (...)." They blamed the Jews for the economical crisis because they said the Jews had a role in it and therefor commited betrayal.
Honestly... I wouldn't be shocked if the Nazis were right in that. I mean... who has most control in the economical world? - Jews do. It is a well known fact that Jews had their own banking systems that were not registered in the system. However, that was a little off-topic
Though read what i said. The Nazis did not start out by killing the Jews. There were years before that. No Hitler did not use Christianity in his politics? The Nazi ideology is also to be called Social-Nationalism. It did not include religion in ANY way. Moussulinis Facism in Italy did, though.
Code:
I don't much care for bible quotes, as I find them irrelevant.
What YOU care about is completly irrelevant because the Zionists do. You can't say that Zionism is a secular ideology because the belief itself has many religious arguments in it and as said the ideology is not a concrete one because there are many forms of Zionism.. including religious.
And that Bible passage is what is the definition of the promised land to the Jews. Ever heard of "From the Nile to Euphrates" before? That is the slogan of the Jewish homeland given to Abraham.
Anti-Semitism is specific to Jews. It is a single word and not a compound word made of two parts. There is no anti-Arab anti-Semitism, it is simply not the definition of the word. You cannot redefine the word to suit your needs. Yes Arabs are Semites, but an anti-Semite is not anti-Arab. Get your definition straight.
The term itself was created in a context to tell that the Semitic race was lower than the Caucasian/Aryan race. It was first later that Jewish scholars changed the meaning of the word so that it only concerned them. Why should i except that modern definition that is based on Jewish scholars who changed the original meaning of the word? The word was actually componed by two parts but Jews today want it to be one word so it will only fit them. If they can change the definition of the word why can't others? Especially when others (like me) refer to the actual meaning of the word. That is BS and i reject that
Get the etymology of the word right.
Are the Kurds allying with the Turks in 1915 not significant to today's current events on the ground? That khmara caused people to rise up and kill. Over a million Jews were displaced from their homes in "Arab lands" in the 20th Century (more than double that of the Palestinian displacement-not that it is an excuse, just a fact). So yes it is very relevant to Jews what this man's actions and words did to them. A diaspora people always remember who the oppressors are, the stories are passed down from generation to generation and not forgotten, and that influences current discourse and opinion very much.
That is not the case. We are weaker today than the time of the genocide because 2/3 of our population was exterminated and that is the effect of the genocide. Not much more actually...
the Israelis have never been as powerfull as today so those actions have not made an impact in any way. It's kind of ironical... the Holocaust actually made the Jews stronger than ever before lol.
And also, I feel very sorry for those Jews. Again, I do not wish agony and dispair for the Jews. However, those Jews who lived in the Middle-East are a MINORITY in Israel. The population of modern Israel is totally alien to the Middle-East. They consists of Khazars and European Jews mainly. The modern state of Israel even keeps on "importing" immigrants so that their population will always be a majority to the Palestinian. They keep importing so many Asians and Africans do they import lol.
By the way, why doesn't anyone ever compare Israel to Mao's China or Stalin's Russia, two much worse states than Germany? Always wondered that. Guess that hyperbole isn't as strong a metaphor. Nothing like rubbing the victims' faces in their own s**t I guess.
Because they actually do look like their old friends of Germany. Stalins Russia did not have ethnic cleansing in their agenda. Also because the irony of them being victims of ethnic cleansing and now doing it themselves. It would be the same as if you were complaining about your father hitting you but when you got children you started hitting them and people who knew both you and your father would compare you to him. Same principe..
by the way.. have a look at the last video i posted.
