Saudi Arabia executes 47 people for terrorism,including Shia cleric

Etain

Member
CXs4T5FUwAAiaI9.jpg

Been following this for awhile now. The death sentence of Shia cleric Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr has been given world outrage. His nephew is sentenced to die by beheading AND THEN CRUCIFIED for protesting when he was 17. He is still alive right now however.
May you hit them back for this Iran.
Saudi Arabia has executed 47 people for terrorism, including the prominent Shia cleric Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr.

Most of those executed on Saturday were involved in a series of attacks carried out by al-Qaida from 2003-06, the interior ministry said.


Saudi Arabia supreme court upholds death sentence on Shia cleric

However, it also detained hundreds of members of its Shi?ite minority after protests in 2011-13, during which several policemen were killed in shooting and petrol bomb attacks. Several of those held had been sentenced to death.

The interior ministry statement began with Koranic verses justifying the use of execution and state television showed footage of the aftermath of al-Qaida attacks in the last decade. Saudi grand mufti Sheikh Abdulaziz Al al-Sheikh appeared on television soon after to describe the executions as just.

Iran?s Shia leadership has warned that executing Nimr ?would cost Saudi Arabia dearly?.

In October 2015 Saudi Arabia?s supreme court rejected an appeal against the death sentence passed earlier on Nimr, who had called for pro-democracy demonstrations and whose arrest in 2012 sparked protests in which three people died.

Nimr had long been regarded as the most vocal Shia leader in the eastern Saudi province of Qatif, willing to publicly criticise the ruling al-Saud family and call for elections. He was, however, careful to avoid calling for violence, analysts say.

That did not prevent the Saudi interior ministry from accusing him of being behind attacks on police, alongside a group of other suspects it said were working on behalf of Shia Iran, the kingdom?s main regional rival.

The executions are Saudi Arabia?s first in 2016. At least 157 people were put to death last year, a big increase from the 90 people killed in 2014.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/02/saudi-arabia-executes-47-people-in-one-day-including-iranian-cleric?CMP=twt_gu
 
:2guns:

I wonder who makes the final decisions in Saudi Arabia. SA has a 'normal' police, religious police and terrorist police so whichever police you get caught by or, just randomly get arrested  by, then you will get charged according to that police -____- . Not to mention, the rules for the rich (businessmen and the royal family) or the superior race (caucasoid) is changed accordingly to favour them.....So corrupt  :)
 
Googoo said:
:2guns:

I wonder who makes the final decisions in Saudi Arabia. SA has a 'normal' police, religious police and terrorist police so whichever police you get caught by or, just randomly get arrested  by, then you will get charged according to that police -____- . Not to mention, the rules for the rich (businessmen and the royal family) or the superior race (caucasoid) is changed accordingly to favour them.....So corrupt  :)

Luckily, Saudi Arabia is internally ripping apart.
 
Kinda off topic, but why do these savages follow the Roman culture by crucifying people? Isn't that a Western tradition?

They should stick with beheading.
 
Neon said:
Kinda off topic, but why do these savages follow the Roman culture by crucifying people? Isn't that a Western tradition?

They should stick with beheading.

Crucifixion is mandated by the Qur'an dude... You didn't know that?
 
mrzurnaci said:
Crucifixion is mandated by the Qur'an dude... You didn't know that?
Do I always have to be extremely specific? My previous post was rather clear.

...Islam adopted crucifixion 600-700 years after the Romans. The Quran "mandating" it or not, they still clearly took it from the Romans before them. They "degraded" themselves by copying a Western tradition Now maybe they adopted crucifixion in order to mimic Jesus's death and mock Christianity? I don't know.

Incidentally, Japan also adopted crucifixion, but that was in the 1500s or so.
 
Neon said:
Do I always have to be extremely specific? My previous post was rather clear.

...Islam adopted crucifixion 600-700 years after the Romans. The Quran "mandating" it or not, they still clearly took it from the Romans before them. They "degraded" themselves by copying a Western tradition Now maybe they adopted crucifixion in order to mimic Jesus's death and mock Christianity? I don't know.

Incidentally, Japan also adopted crucifixion, but that was in the 1500s or so.
Jesus is considered a great prophet in Islam,so doing it as an affront to Jesus would be highly unlikely.

They probably got the idea from the Romans,but to be fair. Tying someone to a stick and waiting for them to die isn't exactly a super specific thing.
 
Etain said:
Jesus is considered a great prophet in Islam,so doing it as an affront to Jesus would be highly unlikely.

They probably got the idea from the Romans,but to be fair. Tying someone to a stick and waiting for them to die isn't exactly a super specific thing.
Jesus being considered a great prophet should be taken with a grain of salt. They don't really revere him that much. They say they do, but that's just the verbal aspect of it. They don't care about him much. And Muslims have mocked him by crucifying Christians (Assyrian/Armenian genocide for one).
 
Do you guys mean the way Jesus was crucified on a cross according to Christianity? No, that's not a punishment. It's beheading with a sword or hanging.

According to Islam, Jesus was not crucified and he was taken up by God and someone else was crucified in his place instead.

Neon said:
Jesus being considered a great prophet should be taken with a grain of salt. They don't really revere him that much. They say they do, but that's just the verbal aspect of it. They don't care about him much. And Muslims have mocked him by crucifying Christians (Assyrian/Armenian genocide for one).

What assholes!  :mad: But, no that's not how it's supposed to be. :)
 
Etain said:

Whaaaaat? Meh, Iran is also so immature. I am against the execution though I had he was innocent from sources and I heard he killed innocent people from other sources, so like usual, I don't believe in anything. However, I've never seen a country interfering with another country's court cases just like Iran does to Saudi..So immature! Even during the hajj accident, Iran demanded compensation from Saudi for the iranians dead...? I mean yeah it was horrible but, come on.  -________-
 
Googoo said:
Do you guys mean the way Jesus was crucified on a cross according to Christianity? No, that's not a punishment. It's beheading with a sword or hanging.

According to Islam, Jesus was not crucified and he was taken up by God and someone else was crucified in his place instead.

What assholes!  :mad: But, no that's not how it's supposed to be. :)
Say that to a couple of Muslims who taunted my aunt's cross back in Jordan, saying "kharap salibich". Lol.
 
Googoo said:
Whaaaaat? Meh, Iran is also so immature. I am against the execution though I had he was innocent from sources and I heard he killed innocent people from other sources, so like usual, I don't believe in anything. However, I've never seen a country interfering with another country's court cases just like Iran does to Saudi..So immature! Even during the hajj accident, Iran demanded compensation from Saudi for the iranians dead...? I mean yeah it was horrible but, come on.  -________-
IDK. Iranians seem to have a thing for embassies.
 
It is escalating by the hour between Iran and Saudi Arabia.

Could this lead to the big 'Shiite vs. Sunni' war that some have predicted?


ASHOOR
 
ASHOOR said:
It is escalating by the hour between Iran and Saudi Arabia.

Could this lead to the big 'Shiite vs. Sunni' war that some have predicted?


ASHOOR

No, the Pahlavis (Iran's monarchy) were shia and Saudi had a good relationship with him.

It's a:

1) Monarchy vs Democracy - Saudi is scared that people will overthrow the AlSauds which is why they maintained a hostile relationship with Iran and made it an "enemy" to all Saudis. So, that the saudi population would view Iran as something bad and they would not want to take any values from it (from little things to major things such as, overthrowing the monarchy)

2) Sunni vs Shia - After the hostility started, they started pinpointing out differences between Iran and Saudi and one major difference was the religious affiliation so people became blinded that it's a religious war.

3) Control of holy sites for instance, Mecca, Medina and Karbala (for shias) - Both are fighting over who wants to be the spokesman of all muslims. Saudi already does that and does not bother taking permission from any other countries about the affairs e.g: the Coalition they announced against terrorism was NOT agreed upon or, actually not even discussed with the countries.

4) Control of the Middle East - Iran wants to actually control the whole of the middle east hence one can see how it took over Iraq, Lebanon, Bahrain and Yemen slyly.
- Iran seized control of Iraq ever since Saddam was toppled

- Hezbollah in Lebanon since 1970s with the Israeli conflict

- Syria ever since 2011 (Initially, Syria was an actual revolution against a man who inherited the position from his father. Then Iran and Saudi decided to rage their war on anything but their grounds as per usual. So, Iran decided to take the Alawite side and Saudi took the side of the revolution assuming people who revolted would primarily be Sunnis since Syria is mainly Sunni).

- Bahrain since the 90's (Iran constantly sends Iranians to get the Bahraini citizenship and then sends their military equipment for them. Lol, then you hear about how the Iranians protested against the Bahraini government infront of the Bahraini embassy in Iran which leads to Bahrain randomly kicking out the Iranian ambassador from Bahrain because it's "upset" - Whackos!)

- Yemen (It was initially a revolution against Ali Saleh then Ali Saleh gets his face burnt so he goes to Saudi for medication. Iran then sees that SA is kind to Ali Saleh so, it decides to fund Houthis who revolted to bring Ali Saleh back. Then Ali Saleh gets better and ditches Saudi for houthis and Iran. Houthis then enter Saudi via Oman and UAE (they both border the Saudi Shia hotspot) they then cause problems for Saudi which lead to Saudis causing a war on them in Yemen. ALL yemenis are against Ali Saleh and initially wanted a gulf intervention to remove him and his supporters, however, now they realised they brought the religious war so they want both Houthis and Gulf out.

On the other hand, Saudi doesn't give two f*cks about the middle east as long as it still has Saudi to itself (which is the biggest country in the Middle East) and they would do their best to keep it this way.
 
Neon said:
Say that to a couple of Muslims who taunted my aunt's cross back in Jordan, saying "kharap salibich". Lol.

I would expect that from them because they believe it's the final abrahamic religion and so they feel like they're on the right path whilst others aren't.  :bash:

 
ASHOOR said:
CXzGQUYWEAAWw6R.jpg


Saudi Arabia vs. ISIS


ASHOOR
^Good one.

I always had a passionate hatred for Saudi Arabia. And now they just heightened it more.
Googoo said:
I would expect that from them because they believe it's the final abrahamic religion and so they feel like they're on the right path whilst others aren't.  :bash:
How about just, all religions aren't in the right path?  :razz:
 
Googoo said:
I would expect that from them because they believe it's the final abrahamic religion and so they feel like they're on the right path whilst others aren't.  :bash:

Yea I never understood that. I'd be feeling bad for non-my-religion people instead of hating them.

Also nice picture ASHOOR :3
 
Neon said:
^Good one.

I always had a passionate hatred for Saudi Arabia. And now they just heightened it more. How about just, all religions aren't in the right path?  :razz:

Honey, you don't have to see Saudis every single weekend while we get invaded every weekend  :) 

mrzurnaci said:
Yea I never understood that. I'd be feeling bad for non-my-religion people instead of hating them.

Also nice picture ASHOOR :3

I know. Some feel the way you do, some feel like they wanna guide the person politely, some are bullies and some are killers.  :)
 
There are a lot of Assyrians in Iran safe for now, I hope those idiots will keep it that way by not going to war over this.
 
Joe25 said:
There are a lot of Assyrians in Iran safe for now, I hope those idiots will keep it that way by not going to war over this.

I hope they get guns while they can!
 
Back
Top