RON PAUL SECOND IN NEVADA :D

Enki

Active member
NICE! He got 4 delegates!! I know its not enough and I know he wont win it. But I just hope his message will get across and he will receive more delegates along the way!

Now maybe CNN or someone will do some more talking about who he is and what he represents!

Congrats RONNY! :yourock:
 
WOO-HOO!  Your guy got 14% of the vote  :clap: He's on his way to the White House!!










:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:  :razz: :razz: :razz: :razz: :razz: :razz: :razz:
 
baklawa said:
WOO-HOO!  Your guy got 14% of the vote  :clap: He's on his way to the White House!!










:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:  :razz: :razz: :razz: :razz: :razz: :razz: :razz:

hahaha...clearly he's not! And i'm not ignorant about that. I just hope that his policies and his ideas begin to spread and enter into the minds of the American people. I'm glad that he managed to get the 4 delegates. Its small yes, but at least it shows people are willing to listen....hint hint!
 
Just because Ronny and myself share the same last name doesn't mean that I'll be voting for him.  I'm still voting Borat in '08.
 
riza o shourba said:
hahaha...clearly he's not! And i'm not ignorant about that. I just hope that his policies and his ideas begin to spread and enter into the minds of the American people. I'm glad that he managed to get the 4 delegates. Its small yes, but at least it shows people are willing to listen....hint hint!

You hope his ideas spread into the minds of the American people?  Please don't put such a pox on my country.  Why doesn't Canada take him?  Privatization of everything under the sun, combined with pseudo-christian values and racism sniffs of fascism.  No thanks.
 
waleeta said:
You hope his ideas spread into the minds of the American people?  Please don't put such a pox on my country.  Why doesn't Canada take him?  Privatization of everything under the sun, combined with pseudo-christian values and racism sniffs of fascism.  No thanks.

Classic Waleeta-ism.  hehehe  :p

:shades:

rum?
 
waleeta said:
You hope his ideas spread into the minds of the American people?  Please don't put such a pox on my country.  Why doesn't Canada take him?  Privatization of everything under the sun, combined with pseudo-christian values and racism sniffs of fascism.  No thanks.

I'd love to have him over Harper. Too bad he's American :( (oh wait, so is Harper...)
 
riza o shourba said:
NICE! He got 4 delegates!! I know its not enough and I know he wont win it. But I just hope his message will get across and he will receive more delegates along the way!

Now maybe CNN or someone will do some more talking about who he is and what he represents!

Congrats RONNY! :yourock:

I'm curious: why do you want him to win? Are you aware that many neo-Nazis want him to win?

Me personally, I think Obama seems to be a descent candidate.
 
I love some of his crazy policies. It takes guts to talk about abolishing the IRS and income tax. It takes guts to say we will pull out of the countries we have no reason to be in and spend those trillions of dollars on bettering ourselves first.

I love it!
 
If there is one candidate I hate with a passion, it's Ron Paul. Abolishing income tax and the Federal Reserve Bank? He's insane. And he's promising to destroy the deficit we're in? BS. 44% of our federal government's income is from income tax. Abolishing it would only make it worse. I want to end it right there...hahaha, I can go on forever about how much I can't stand him.
 
Ashuriena said:
If there is one candidate I hate with a passion, it's Ron Paul. Abolishing income tax and the Federal Reserve Bank? He's insane. And he's promising to destroy the deficit we're in? BS. 44% of our federal government's income is from income tax. Abolishing it would only make it worse. I want to end it right there...hahaha, I can go on forever about how much I can't stand him.

Liberal.  :2hearts:
 
Ashuriena said:
If there is one candidate I hate with a passion, it's Ron Paul. Abolishing income tax and the Federal Reserve Bank? He's insane. And he's promising to destroy the deficit we're in? BS. 44% of our federal government's income is from income tax. Abolishing it would only make it worse. I want to end it right there...hahaha, I can go on forever about how much I can't stand him.

He can eliminate it easily by NOT spending the trillions that the government is already spending on the "war on terror"
 
shamirum said:
Liberal.  :2hearts:

:swoon:

riza o shourba said:
He can eliminate it easily by NOT spending the trillions that the government is already spending on the "war on terror"

How? By destroying the greatest federal revenue this country has? We're in debt and eliminating the largest source of federal revenue isn't going to get us anywhere, especially seeing how the federal government already has a long list of expenditures, not including the war on terror. As a super power as the US is, we have expenditures through the roof! Not only through foreign affairs (aiding victims of national disasters among other things, while I'm purposely excluding the war in order for you to see how much we spend), but on our own domestic territory as well. With the events of Katrina and the levees breaking and the lawsuits, we have so much to repay and rebuild. With welfare, medicare/medicaid, social security, federal grants to states for rebuilding of highways, roads, and schools as well as public libraries, and public transportation amongst a great deal of other imperative things. There is so much our government spends on. We spend billions on aid and on domestic necessities aside from the war. It all adds up. I understand that this war brought us into debt and no one in the US will ever debate that issue, but destroying income tax and the federal reserve bank to take us out of debt is nonsensical, especially considering all the other expenditures we need to finance.

I don't know about you, but I've been a public university student and I will be going through the public university system again these next few years and I know how costly it is. When I first attended public schooling, it was pretty cheap at Cal Poly Pomona (a state school) and it only cost me roughly $4,000. If it weren't for government revenue turned into student aid through federal grants given to states, my tuition would've been through the roof in order for the school to be able to provide for the student services, faculty, staff, etc. I was paying JUST $4,000. Do you have any idea how much more expensive it would be without government aid? I wasn't using FAFSA (Free Application for Federal Student Aid), but it was the average tuition of a state school within California. It was with taxpayer money that I, as other state school students, was able to afford schooling.

We need income tax because we need higher government revenue. It doesn't hurt to pay income taxes...we've been doing it for years and years and years. It has helped us generate more money to finance a lot of the wonders of America and beyond, so why stop now? If we're generating more money, we'll be out of debt faster, so I don't see the need to eliminate income tax.
 
Income tax is bullshit, you shouldn't be taxed on your LABOR...that's all he's saying, he's not saying we abolish all taxes, he's saying you only abolish income tax from LABOR.  I put in 8 hrs of work, i shouldn't get taxed cause I'm doing labor in exchange for pay, fair trade. I invested in the stock market and hit it big, get taxed cause that was attained durign my "spare time". I buy clothes, get taxed. the income tax is bullshit made up by the FED, which is a private bank. It was created in 1912 or something to fuck with you. 

Go read up on it and youll see why it's bullshit. or better yet watch that documentary, freedom to fascism.  The whole movie there trying to get the IRS to show us the tax code that forces us to pay incoem tax on labor, and it's not there! Watch that, it was made by Aaron Russo, you can find it on google video.

 
First, I'm not saying that Ron Paul wants to abolish all taxes. I made it clear that it was income tax and the Federal Reserve Bank. If you'd like, re-read my original and second post.

Second, are you serious? Income taxes are imperative to our government as they make up over 44% of our federal government's revenue. Without income tax, so many governmental programs and aids would be shut down and impossible to have within this nation. Income tax has been around for thousands and thousands of years. Even our ancient ancestors taxed with their land taxes and taxes on crops.

Decreasing federal government revenue would not destroy America's debt, but it would create a larger deficit with additional spending in the red. Lets look at this from a business perspective. If a company has 500 employees and all of a sudden, a giant drop in consumers hits (major profit loss), where will the company find money to produce the same product or better yet, to pay for their employees? They'll declare Chapter 11 and everyone will be out of their jobs. Imagine yourself a business owner who gets hit with a 44% profit loss while the demand for your goods and services are still high. How would you pay for what you need to produce your goods and services for people? How would you pay for your employees?

It wouldn't work out without income tax. We're not living in some utopian society in which it would be possible. We need income taxation in order to generate profit for our government so that in turn, our government can keep aiding the American people while investing in our students with financial aid for education. The more educated students in America, the better and more higher paying jobs they get so they can then in turn pay greater income tax (as it is based on percentage) and invest it back into our government. Without this cycle, our government would have no great form of revenue.

Third, no thanks. Aaron Russo didn't like income tax because of the $2 million of tax liens from the state of California and New York as well as the IRS that were filed against him prior to his death.
 
riza o shourba said:
I love some of his crazy policies. It takes guts to talk about abolishing the IRS and income tax. It takes guts to say we will pull out of the countries we have no reason to be in and spend those trillions of dollars on bettering ourselves first.

I love it!

As long as he's not a Jewish puppet like the other candidates, I like the guy. But Obama seems sort of independent, and he seems genuine and honest and like he means well. Pretty much every American president succumbs to the Jewish AIPAC lobby.
 
Ashuriena, if they don't want to abolish the income tax then give us something in return.  This 44% bullshit is crap, the US lends out too much money to developing nations that's why it's got a deficit.  Also, More imports than exports, so no matter what you do you will be running at a deficit.  I think they actually like running at a deficit.  Certain states like Texas don't even have a personal income tax, so how is there state gov't able to function without the magic 44%? 

Second, are you serious? Income taxes are imperative to our government as they make up over 44% of our federal government's revenue. Without income tax, so many governmental programs and aids would be shut down and impossible to have within this nation. Income tax has been around for thousands and thousands of years. Even our ancient ancestors taxed with their land taxes and taxes on crops.

Where did you get the 44%? from the IRS website? or the federal gov't one? lol I wouldn't trust either

Income tax hasn't been around for thousands of years, taxes have been around for a long ass time but not income taxes, you never paid tax on your labor.  it was a fuckin barter system back in the day...you give me this and i give you that, no one took income tax a thousand years ago!  ancient land tax = property tax, I dunno what taxes on crops are, never heard of this. How did they take taxes in crops back then, leyn parmuyeh?

Why should this gov't run at a deficit, they're not offering social programs galore?? They bring that shit upon themselves cause they sure as hell ain't offering anything to us.  Where are all the social programs? Utopian society doesn't mean you don't pay taxes, I would consider euro countries, canada, australia...closer to utopia then america and they are known for having "high", which is bs, taxes BUT they get a lot in return...the least of which is also having a high fuckin quality of life. 

 
KhIgGaAaAaAa said:
Ashuriena, if they don't want to abolish the income tax then give us something in return.  This 44% bull**** is crap, the US lends out too much money to developing nations that's why it's got a deficit.  Also, More imports than exports, so no matter what you do you will be running at a deficit.  I think they actually like running at a deficit.  Certain states like Texas don't even have a personal income tax, so how is there state gov't able to function without the magic 44%? 

Where did you get the 44%? from the IRS website? or the federal gov't one? lol I wouldn't trust either

Income tax hasn't been around for thousands of years, taxes have been around for a long ass time but not income taxes, you never paid tax on your labor.  it was a ****in barter system back in the day...you give me this and i give you that, no one took income tax a thousand years ago!  ancient land tax = property tax, I dunno what taxes on crops are, never heard of this. How did they take taxes in crops back then, leyn parmuyeh?

Why should this gov't run at a deficit, they're not offering social programs galore?? They bring that **** upon themselves cause they sure as hell ain't offering anything to us.  Where are all the social programs? Utopian society doesn't mean you don't pay taxes, I would consider euro countries, canada, australia...closer to utopia then america and they are known for having "high", which is bs, taxes BUT they get a lot in return...the least of which is also having a high ****in quality of life.   

If you can't trust an IRS website, let alone any other federal government information, why are you still in this country? I'm not trying to be mean or offend you in anyway, but if you are a conspiracy theorist about the deception of this nation, why are you still a resident/citizen of this country? Wouldn't you want to be living in these so-called "closer-to-utopian" countries, like Canada (isn't this an oxymoron)?

How is Canada a "closer-to-utopian" nation when the major candidates of Canada actually agreed that their health care system is a complete failure? The OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) even found that Canada spends the most tax dollars on health care yet has one of the lowest quality of medical equipment, access to physicians, and health outcomes. (If you're questioning it, type in "Canada - medical" in Google and see all the terrible things written about Canada's healthcare).

What does Canada get in return? I'd really like to know. What has Canada done? Their universal healthcare is down the drain and their entire economy is dependent on US trade which makes up almost 80% of their exports and roughly 65% of their imports. If you want to talk about BS, lets talk about their 6% unemployment rate when Canada has a population of 35 million. As opposed to America's unemployment rate of 5% with a population of 303 million in America. Is this the "closer-to-utopia" you were talking about?

And I don't want to talk about high quality of life...this would turn into a 300 page essay. :giggle:

As a super power, the US is in a position in which it must financially assist developing countries. America is already hated by the outside world...if we didn't have this, imagine how much more terrible we'd seem. But anyways, image aside, America has a responsibility to help developing nations grow. We have to assist those through genocides and those through national disasters because although we are globally divided as countries, we must show humanitarian effort to promote some sort of unity. America is even financially assisting Assyrians in Iraq with millions of dollars as well. If anything, it still hits home.

Contrary to what you may believe about aid programs, the federal government does spend a great deal on them. Not only does it fund welfare, social security, medicare/medicaid, and a great deal of other necessities, but we also have school programs that provide better education for students as well as making education more financially accessible to students (low fees of state schools and other public colleges and universities) alongside child welfare programs. These are just to name a few from the several programs that the government provides. Our government does more for us than we know. The freeways/highways we drive on are mostly maintained through federal grants given to the states to use on state necessities, like rebuilding and maintenance of freeways/highways and public libraries, schools, etc.

If you want more facts in regards to income tax allowing for greater federal government revenue and supporting a free market economy, Cornell law school (Ivy League school) actually wrote something in regards to this:

"In 1985 for example, the government collected over $450 billion in income tax from a total of $742 billion in total internal revenue receipts. The funds collected are essential for the shaping and preservation of a free market economy." (http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/index.php/Income_tax)

I don't know why you're trying to refute the 44%. It's not a fallacy. It's a fact. I've read it in numerous books, the IRS information, and through federal government information (their factbooks). Some states, like Nevada, don't have a state income tax, but they still have a federal income tax (every state is required to pay a federal income tax). They are able to survive because of the lower cost of living. You have to understand that wages are not the same throughout the states as well as the cost of living because in some states like New York and California, the cost of living is much higher (thus the wages are usually higher to allow for living) and therefore, there is a greater need of state government revenue. Also, these states hold great metropolitan cities like New York City and Los Angeles. LA County has a resident population of over 11 million people in such a small county. With such populations comes a higher level of people living below the poverty line. I believe in LA it's roughly 17% of the 11 million living below the poverty line. Therefore, the institution of state income tax was necessary in order to help fund more programs that may not necessarily be aided by federal grants to provide for these people.

Finally, if you want the tax code for income tax, it's Title 26 of the US Code (26 P.S.C). Subtitle A speaks thoroughly about income tax. :)
 
Yea that post was too long, i didn't read everything.

Papers by universities and phd's dont mean much either cause as many discertations you find citing the usefulness of the income tax I can find the same amount refuting it.  Just as many papers as you find patting america on the back for its "social programs" I can find the same number refuting them. 

How is Canada a "closer-to-utopian" nation when the major candidates of Canada actually agreed that their health care system is a complete failure? The OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) even found that Canada spends the most tax dollars on health care yet has one of the lowest quality of medical equipment, access to physicians, and health outcomes. (If you're questioning it, type in "Canada - medical" in Google and see all the terrible things written about Canada's healthcare).

Who's the OECD and what country are they from?  Canada - medical in google ay...yup thats foolproof right there.  What developed nation has the highest number of infant deaths out of 1000?  What nation has higher life expectancies canada or america?? google those 2 and tell me what you find.

This is an issue where you believe what you want to believe and use your own experience.  Not everyone hates it and not everyone likes it.  In my eyes, they dont do shit.  In the convos i've had with people from other countries and stuff I've read in businessweek on healthcare in this country, retirement, social security all that shit...I dont like where it is and the direction it's going.  if you take a survey of the people, cause the people are the most important right, not the gov't..or so I hope. I bet you'll find more canadians, australians, euro's happier and healthier than americans but then again that's just my guess. 

I also read in a book somewhere that james frey said...O yea thats right, turned out to be bullshit. 

Get back to me in 50 years, January 29, 2058 come back to this forum and tell me how your life went, and how your retirement (if you are retired by then) is going and how easy it is for you to live comfortable.  if you don't see where this is headed then i truly feel sorry for you.  By the time we get older, social security will be non existent, retirement age will be about 75 because of longer life spans and they want you to live like max 3 yrs after youu retire so you can die right away and not drain the system.  So that means all that money you put in your 401k so you can take it out tax-free when you retire won't be possible until you got one foot in the grave.  And if you decide to be a rebel and unpatriotic and retire at 70, then fuck you give me 30%, hopefully thats all they take, of your 401k and go kill yourself.


As for why am i still here, I just recently graduated college and got my bachelor's this past december 2007.  So moving to another country is not as easy as just picking up and going.  I don't want to be an illegal immigrant in another country and have no money and be working like a mexican does here.  I spent too much money on school to become that.  So until I save some money and get a job offer in canada OR get married to a canadian citizen and get my citizenship, i won't move because it isn't the smartest course of action.  Not that it's your business but I just wanted to let you know. 

Can I ask you a personal question now?  How come you choose to have or not have sex? and also how many american flag stickers do you have on the back of your car? 

Finally, if you want the tax code for income tax, it's Title 26 of the US Code (26 P.S.C). Subtitle A speaks thoroughly about income tax

post that if you could cause I wanna see where it says I should get taxed on my labor.
 
I had written an entire argument rebutting your statements, but then I thought...f*ck it. You're not going to read it and it's completely pointless arguing my points to someone who obviously distrusts the government to such an extent that he wouldn't believe what I said anyways. So f*ck it. Go ahead and vote for Ron Paul...that's one more vote taken away from Obama. :)

Hillary 2008.
 
Income taxes are NOT imperitive to your countries economic survival.

Lets look at it logically. If you eliminate the income tax and the whole BS Federal Reserve and IRS, in essence you will still save tax dollars in financing those departments (which alone cost millions). Secondly, your population will have more money in their pockets.

This perception of having more money in their pocket results in more spending. Now we're getting at the juicy part.

Well, if we know that with more money comes more spending, the government can do a few things to capitalize on this. One, raise sales taxes and second, raise property taxes. Granted it will not cover ALL the money that was being gathered through the income tax, but it will still be a start.

With this large spending of money comes an economic boom. As a result, you will see more jobs created while many more products are consumed and demand increasing for products.

Thats one part. The second part, and this would be the absolute essential part of it, they would need to look over their budget and "cut the fat out". The fat would include the TRILLIONS being spent on the "War on Terror" (that seriously, we all know can never be won since there is no real enemy but rather an idea). Bring the military spending down substantially to a few million. Its more than enough to defend your country from an attack and enough as well to develop your technology.

I also think Ron was talking about cutting down on the congress members and house or representatives as well in terms of cutting back spending (I'm not certain). I know he's in favour of abolishing so many government agencies that he sees as unnecessary.

Anyway, I don't have monetary figures available at my disposal so all my comments are assumptions. But they make valid sence to me I think.

http://www.zeitgeistthemovie.com

They'll explain more about it in part 2 or 3 I can't remember.
 
Back
Top