Western investigations are less biased? Is that like CNN when 225 Assyrians were taken captive by ISIS (Israeli Secret Intelligence Service) and barely a word about it? The same western investigations which insisted Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, simply to do Israel's dirty work for them?
I know you love your Zionists but being anti Assyrian too? Unbelievable!
Why is ISIS Israeli? Maybe they're an indigenous Muslim resistance to the Kurds and the (moderate) Arabs there, much like Hamas.


Let's be consistent with that logic. Maybe ISIS have suffered so much under the hands of Iraqis, Syrians and Christians there. So they need to resist?....Oh wait, since they're not in Palestine/Gaza, these Islamic terrorists are now "Jewz/Israeliz"

Sorry, but
this is unbelievable actually.
So, your logic:
- Terrorists in Palestine/Gaza: Resistance force who oppose the dirty occupiers
- Terrorists in Iraq, Syria, Turkey: Israelis in disguise
What of the Taliban and Al Qaeda? They're Israelis too I guess? Or maybe American? Come on man.
As for the Assyrian-Kurdish situation: By investigations I mean at least non-Assyrian/Kurdish sources or reports about these incidents. An outside perspective of it. Hell, I'd take a Turkish source too because the Turks are antagonistic towards both Kurds and us, so they wouldn't have any bias. Btw, not sure if you read my post properly, I said that I was playing the "
devil's advocate". I'm far from an anti-Assyrian, but I surely don't trust sources if they come from us only. I'm not biased and I do like to observe the other side of the coin here.