I destroyed IRAQ its History, culture and Human too!!!

Moneer

Moneer

Member
moayedmuhsin.jpg


I helped destroy Iraq, its History, Culture and Humanity. donald rumsfeld
He was handed a book containing ?a how to" run Iraq after occupation, you know like Germany and Japan, But it was said that he pick it up and throw it in the rubbish bin!!! He did a great service for his motherland Israel, and I think they should give him a medal if they haven?t yet. Now Iraq is back in Stone Age with Beheadings just like the good old days of Mohammed.
Original Painting by Moayed Muhsin
 
Rumsfeld isn't Jewish.  His motherland is Germany.  He's Christian, so I'm pretty sure this mess is all the fault of Jesus, right?  Maybe the Presbytarian church should give him a medal or something.
 
jacob said:
Rumsfeld isn't Jewish.  His motherland is Germany.  He's Christian, so I'm pretty sure this mess is all the fault of Jesus, right?  Maybe the Presbytarian church should give him a medal or something.
Click to expand...

Where in my post dose it say that Rum is Jewish?
 
This is what the person who posted this message is saying (in few points):

(1) It was never the intention of US to improve or ?Democratise? Iraq? (now it is taken by Iran).
(2) Saddam was the main threat to Israel in Middle East, and he was the main target of the attack on Iraq. (he is dead, Israel is happy, and I am happy too but sad about what has happened to Iraq).
(3) Jewish lobby is powerful in US and was able to link Saddam to Al-Qaeda and 11 September attacks, (which now we know it was fake facts).
(4) US had no respect to the culture and history of Iraq. Archaeologists had already warned and detailed important sites so US would stay away from bombing them, and also informed them on the need to protect Iraq museums. But all that was not taken seriously by US (as we all now know, they had build basses on top of ancient Babylonian sites and drove tanks over them?etc).
(5) I can go on and on but I don?t think you are going to read a loooong reply anyway?
 
Israel stands to benefit the least from this.  The invasion of Iraq helped Iran expand into Iraq.  In no way is that good for Israel. Saddam was never a threat to Israel.  They could have neutralized him much quicker than Iran.

There is no need to link this botched invasion to the Jews.  It was cowboys who ran this mission.
 
Moneer Cherie said:
I don?t think if it is even worth replying to your gibberish reply?!!!
Click to expand...

I actually thought the same when I saw your "IRAQ"-post. Isn?t there any IraqiVoiceNet forum or so where you can wine about your state? This here is ASSYRIANvoiceNet.
 
Moneer Cherie said:
Where in my post dose it say that Rum is Jewish?
Click to expand...

Oh, I'm sorry.  I guess I misinterpreted your usage of saying that Israel was his motherland.  I suppose then that if he's not Jewish, that you're saying he's Palestinian.  Yep, then in that case this whole thing really benefitted his motherland.
 
Zawoyo said:
I actually thought the same when I saw your "IRAQ"-post. Isn?t there any IraqiVoiceNet forum or so where you can wine about your state? This here is ASSYRIANvoiceNet.
Click to expand...

There are a lot of Assyrians from Iraq here, so stop your childish bickering.  It's getting really annoying and racist.

It's sick when Assyrians are welcome on Iraqi websites, but we have non-Iraqi Assyrians being racist towards them on this website. Enough is enough, JOHN.
 
Apparently you even don?t know what racism is, no wonder if you think you don?t need to read a book to know something.

His topic shows that he comes here as Iraqi to discuss an Iraqi topic, and I said he should go to Iraqis to discuss Iraqi issues.

I don?t go to Turkish forums to discuss Assyrian topics...
 
This is a website where intelligent people can discuss any topic.  ANY TOPIC. 

If you have a problem with that, then you should discuss with Ashoor.

Iraq is related to the Assyrian cause more than Turkey, Syria, or any other garbage country where other Assyrians might live in.

Turks are racists.  That's a fact.  Assyrians shouldn't be just because someone else is. Keep talking about reading books. lol
 
Ah, if I say something about Iraq which sounds negative to you than it´s racism and so on, but if you say something negative about other states this is ok, or what?
You measure of double standards.

Iraq is more related to Assyrian cause? Isn´t the origin of Assyrians North Mesopotamia? Isn´t Southeast Turkey a big part of North Mesopotamia?

Your logic is contradictory, when do you check it?

Greetings to your "intelligence"  and to your "intelligent" friends who laugh about reading books. :bangin:
 
jacob said:
Oh, I'm sorry.  I guess I misinterpreted your usage of saying that Israel was his motherland.  I suppose then that if he's not Jewish, that you're saying he's Palestinian.  Yep, then in that case this whole thing really benefitted his motherland.
Click to expand...

That?s called figure of Speech?Get it? The first thing that any new American elected president does is to declare openly that ?Israel is untouchable ?. That's what I am referring too here, not his grandfather or grandmother, that part needs more research...
 
jonadona said:
Israel stands to benefit the least from this.  The invasion of Iraq helped Iran expand into Iraq.  In no way is that good for Israel. Saddam was never a threat to Israel.  They could have neutralized him much quicker than Iran.

There is no need to link this botched invasion to the Jews.  It was cowboys who ran this mission.
Click to expand...

I disagree. Don?t forget at that time of history Saddam was their main enemy after all he was the only ?Modern? president in the Arab world to attack Israel. We don?t want to blame Israel for everything, like the arab do, but we have to be realistic?
Yes, Now Iran is the winner in iraq, but Now Iran is Next.
 
lol Iran is nothing like Iraq the people are united and it?s not a fake country created by French and English, the Persians think they are a superior race and want to return to their former glory
if the invading crusaders can?t win in Afghanistan what makes you think they will win in Iran?
 
jonadona said:
Israel stands to benefit the least from this.  The invasion of Iraq helped Iran expand into Iraq.  In no way is that good for Israel. Saddam was never a threat to Israel.  They could have neutralized him much quicker than Iran.

There is no need to link this botched invasion to the Jews.  It was cowboys who ran this mission.
Click to expand...
Jews had an important role in the Iraq war, but it didn't go according to their plans:

?The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history.? ? Ari Shavit

Don't take my word for it though, check the Jewish source:

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=280279

Likewise, it's also "neo-con" (should be called zio-con though) Jews like Norman Podhoretz and others (Netanyahu etc.) who are trying to convince white Americans that it would be a good idea to bomb Iran:

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/the-case-for-bombing-iran-10882

I'm sure I'm "anti-Semitic" now for pointing this out, but the Jewish influence in instigating America into war in the Middle East cannot and should not be denied. It shouldn't be denied either that Israel is sponsoring the Kurds with weapons?the very same weapons Kurds are killing Assyrians with?and military training and an independent "Kurdistan" over Assyrian land:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5364982.stm

Donald Rumsfeld on the other hand is a foolish Shabbez Goy. And so are you, Jonadona, you're clueless as always.
 
jonadona said:
Israel stands to benefit the least from this.  The invasion of Iraq helped Iran expand into Iraq.  In no way is that good for Israel. Saddam was never a threat to Israel.  They could have neutralized him much quicker than Iran.

There is no need to link this botched invasion to the Jews.  It was cowboys who ran this mission.
Click to expand...

Well, if you consider Iraq to have been one of Israel's greatest regional threats (next to Iran), then I don't think there's any doubt that Israel benefited from the ousting of Hussein, and his replacement by a more western-friendly regime. It's not an issue of contention whether Israel wanted Hussein eliminated from power, because frankly he was a threat to Israel's hegemony in the region (albeit his regime was much weaker and much less of a threat in 2003, but a threat nonetheless).

Secondly, I think Iran's influence in Iraq is highly overstated. Yes Iran has a considerable degree of influence in Iraq, however it's highly doubtful whether it is to the extent that Iran has any direct involvement in policy-making in Iraq. Sure, some Iraqi officials in power might have once lived in Iran as a safe-haven from Saddam's Ba'athist regime, however there has always been some friction and tension between Iraqi Sh'ites and the Sh'ites of Iran.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top