From $128 billion surplus to a $482 billion deficit

baklawa

New member
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush's budget chief blamed the faltering economy and the bipartisan stimulus package for the record $482 billion deficit the White House predicted for the 2009 budget year.

Jim Nussle, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, said the deficit would be about 3.3 percent of the nation's gross domestic product, the measure of the nation's total economy.

The federal deficit is the difference between what the government spends and what it takes in from taxes and other revenue sources. The government must borrow money (we owe billions to China) to make up the difference.

President Bush inherited a budget surplus of $128 billion when he took office in 2001 but has since posted a budget deficit every year.

The Bush administration has spent heavily on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and faces a large budget shortfall in tax revenue because of Bush's tax cuts and a souring economy.

A Democratic point man on the budget, Sen. Kent Conrad of North Dakota, blasted the administration for its "reckless fiscal policies," blaming the president's tax cuts for driving the government into deficit and saying Bush "will be remembered as the most fiscally irresponsible president in our nation's history."

Conrad, who chairs the Senate's budget committee, accused the president of "squandering" the surplus he inherited from President Bill Clinton and said the increased debt the government has taken on to cover the deficit has undermined the value of the dollar and hurt the overall economy.

"If they gave out Olympic medals for fiscal irresponsibility, President Bush would take the gold, silver and bronze," Conrad said. "With his eight years in office, he will have had the five highest deficits ever recorded. And the highest of those deficits is now projected to come in 2009, as he leaves office."

 
Government spending isn't necessarily a bad thing.  According to neo-classical Macroeconomics, govt spending actually helps an economy move out of a recession/avoid one - since military expenditure is part of government spending, it boosts gdp/production, and economic activity.

As long as the war is not in the US & the money is spent on goods produced in the US or owned by US companies, and it doesn't put excessive pressure on public debt, so as to crowd out private savings, it shouldn't be too much of a problem, and could in fact be one of the only things preventing the US from having a recession.
 
TAX REVENUES ARE ACTUALLY UP since 2000 (http://www.heritage.org/research/features/budgetchartbook/fed-rev-spend-2008-boc-C1-Federal-Spending-Is-Growing.html).  The Bush Administration and GOP controlled congress from 2001-2007 perpetrated one of the greatest fiscal frauds known to man as they abandoned their principals and violated decades of promises of fiscal responsibility.

Sorry for the runon sentence there, but this issue is why I can't stomach the GOP anymore.  Ted Stevens should have been indicted long ago for his earmark addiction.  Makes me ill, literally.

 
Back
Top