Assyrian vs. Mongol Empires: reading from the book "Genghis Khan and the making of the modern world"

Status
Not open for further replies.

ASHOOR

Administrator
Staff member
I am currently reading a fascinating book about Genghis Khan and the Mongolian empire called ‘Genghis Khan and the making of the modern world’ by Jack Weatherford.

I am more than half way done and hope to finish the book in 2 weeks or so. In fact, the book has been so good to read, I sometimes could go for over 1-2 hours reading it and don’t want to put it down (Kindle version)

I have been making notes throughout, and I hope to share some of it here and try to make comparisons with the Assyrian empire and their rule.

But for now, I just have to note that despite their amazing strength and speed with which they took over half of Asia and some parts of Europe, their dominance only lasted around a century or so (1206-1294) which when compared to the dominance of the Assyrian empire is like a blip on the radar. Assyrian history as a dominant empire is so long that it is divided its into three distinct periods, starting from the Bronze Age and all the way to the Neo-Assyrian period until the fall of the empire in 612 B.C.


It is also important to note, while I will try to make some general comparisons and contrast between the two empires, it is a futile attempt to answer the question of "who is stronger" or "who would win in a battle" : this is similar to another popular debate we often hear in soccer (Pele vs. Messi) or in basketball (Jordan vs. Bryant) where you are comparing players and systems from two very different eras. But it is even harder to compare these two empires, since they are separate by clsoe to 2 millenniums (Assyrian empire fell in 612 B.C while the Mongol empire rose to prominence in 1220 A.D) . But it is understandable that such comparisons can be fun, especially for history and ancient military enthusiasts.

My Post (1).png
 
Last edited:
I have now finished the full book. Amazing book, fully recommended!

I will share some of the notes I took from the book, how Genghis Khan grew up, and all the turning points in his life that led to him becoming one of the greatest leaders in history, and by extension the Mongol empire that he founded from almost nothing.

Note:
Temujin = Genghis Khan's birth name (1158 –1227)
Hoelun = Genghis Khan's mother
Begter = half-brother of Genghis Khan
Khasar = Genghis Khan's younger brother
Jamuka = GK's childhood friend, who later turns into an enemy
Ong Khan. = a khan of the Keteyid tribe as well as a spiritual adviser to GK in his early years

Genghis Khan = will refer to him as GK in most cases

The implication of the story seemed clear; Hoelun would accept Begter as her husband when he became old enough, thereby making him the head of the family in every sense. Temujin, however, decided not to tolerate such a situation with Begter. After the emotional confrontation with his mother over Begter, Temujin threw aside the felt covering over the doorway, a highly offensive gesture in Mongol culture, and angrily rushed off, followed by his younger brother Khasar.
After his dad was killed by another tribe, Genghis Khan' half brother (Begter) would essentially have t marry his step mom to replace the dead father, as Mongol traditions dictated. This enraged GK and stormed out, marking in my opinion - in addition to the death of his dad-one of the earliest turning points in his life. One that would likely lead to his shaping.


By putting Khasar, who was the better shot, in front while he himself took the rear, he also showed his tactical acumen. Like the horse that must be first in every race, Temujin had determined he would lead, not follow. In order to achieve this primacy of place, he proved himself willing to violate custom, defy his mother, and kill whoever blocked his path, even if it was his own family member.
Here, we can see GK developing acumen for early life leadership and military strategy.


The story of Temujin’s escape from this impossible situation is further testament to his character, which would shape his rise to power.
This is in reference to a story where GK was abducted and held hostage by a rival tribe, but through sheer luck, bravery and acumen, he managed to survive and escape. Easily one of the biggest turning points in his life, one that would teach him so much about defeating his enemies.



Though he had sought to create a quiet life apart from the constant turmoil of steppe warfare, the Merkid raid had taught him that such a life was simply not to be had. If he did not want to live the life of an impoverished outcast, always at the mercy of whatever raiders chose to swoop down on his encampment, he would now have to fight for his place in the hierarchy of steppe warriors; he would have to join in the harsh game of constant warfare he had thus far avoided.
This realization was a huge turning point in his young life. The Merkid, in addition to the Tayichiuds, were two rival tribes that constantly attacked GK's family and tribe. Having had enough of these raids , he decided to start playing offence and no sit ideal and be restricted to defending only. I don't think we would have a remarkable Mongol Empire if not for this simple realization by GK.


Temujin chose to fight. He would find his wife, or he would die trying. After those three difficult days of pondering, praying, and planning on the mountain, Temujin followed....... Although the other two women were not rescued, Temujin had won his wife back again, and nothing else mattered now.
This is in reference to an episode where his wife was abducted and taken as a slave wife by another rival tribe. He basically went on the offence against a more powerful and experienced tribe, one that had been engaged in fly-by raids for years if not decades.



As already evidenced in his family relations, Temujin was not one to accept being treated as an inferior for long, and soon enough this situation proved unacceptable to him. .
A turning point that shows that Temujin doesn't want to be treated or seen as an inferior and wants to be the superior one in any relationship, including with his own friends and family.


After his split with Jamuka, at the age of nineteen, Temujin seems to have determined to become a warrior leader of his own, to attract his own followers and build a base of power, eventually aiming to become a khan, the leader and unifier of the unruly Mongol tribe
This was decided by GK at the mere age of 19! He knew he wanted to a leader from such an early age and this wasn't something that he developers much later in life.


Having received the support he deemed sufficient to function as the khan of a minor group, Temujin began a radical process of erecting a novel power structure within his tribe, calling on the lessons of his youth for guidance.
This is where he started to formalise his power and


The episode proved a decisive turning point for Temujin, who had lost the battle but gained public support and sympathy among the Mongols, who were increasingly fearful of the cruelty of Jamuka. Temujin’s warriors had been routed, but they would slowly collect together again behind their young khan
This is a reference to a battle that took place between GK and his childhood friend-now turned enemy- Jamuka.


Not only had the Jurkin failed to join Temujin’s force in the fight against the Tatars, they now took advantage of Temujin’s absence by raiding his base camp, killing ten of his followers and stripping the remainder of their clothes and other possessions.
The Jurkin was another Mongol tribe/clan, who betrayed GK by attacking his base and causing lots of causalities amongst his family and followers.
 
Last edited:
At this point, Temujin instituted the second radical change in ruling style—the first being the appointment of loyal allies as opposed to family members to key positions in his entourage—that would mark his rise to power.
Having seen enough betrayal from his own family and friends, he did away from the system of appointing people to positions of power simply based on their family ties, relying instead on loyalty.


Temujin had rid himself of all the leaders of the Jurkin. The messages were clear to all their related clans on the steppe. To those who followed Temujin faithfully, there would be rewards and good treatment. To those who chose to attack him, he would show no mercy.
This is the neighbouring small tribe that was mentioned earlier as having betrayed and attacked GK's base and it was now time to take revenge and revenge he did, as he raided their camp and completely destroyed them.


It was during this revolt that Temujin’s father, Yesugei, became the ally of Ong Khan. By choosing this title, Jamuka was publicly challenging the power of Ong Khan as well as his subordinate, Temujin...If Jamuka could win this war, he would be the supreme ruler of the central steppe. He had on his side the important and aristocratic clans such as the Tayichiud, to which Temujin’s family had once been subservient and who had enslaved Temujin when he was a boy
Here is Jamuka again, GK's former childhood friend, now vying to become the main ruler of the Mongol tribes and the steppe ( a geographical reference to the mostly flat and open hills the Mongol tribes lived on. He continues to be the thorn in GK's side!
 
According to the account in the Secret History, late in the day, an arrow pierced Temujin Khan’s neck
This happened during a fight with yet another rival tribe: the Taychiud. Imaging an arrow hitting your neck and surviving! That is how lucky GK's life was. It is as he meant to live to go on and became the leader he would become. in fact while gk had lost consciousness overnight, one of his loyal followers (Jelme) stayed by his side and literally sucked the blood from the wound (It is a Mongol taboo to see blood or let it flow and touch the ground)


The Tayichiud did not know of Temujin’s wound, and during the night many of them began to sneak off the battlefield
Again, how lucky is GK? Had they known he was wounded, it would have been a huge moral boost to them, and would have continued the battle until they crushed GK's warriors, and the rest would be history!


As the morning light came, Temujin’s sight cleared, and he saw the blood around him and his half-dressed companion; he was confused and asked what had happened. Upon hearing the account of the night, his discomfort at the sight of his own blood on the ground so close to him made him ask, “Couldn’t you have spit it somewhere else?” Despite the apparent lack of gratitude, Temujin never forgot how Jelme saved him from the Tayichiud, and he later entrusted Jelme with some of the most important expeditions of the Mongol conquests.
Jerk much? or just recovering and confused about what had happened? It doens't really matter, as he had miraculously survived (If you are keeping count of his spirits, that is like the 5th one?)


By the next morning, most of the warriors had fled, and Temujin sent his warriors in pursuit. As he had done with the defeated Jurkin, Temujin killed off most of their leaders but accepted the rest as his own followers
Another turning point where his force and influence grew exponentially literally overnight. Imagine, less than 24 hours ago, he was virtually dead from the arrow and his entire camp could have been defeated as a result of that huge loss of their leader.


In another innovation, he ordered that a soldier’s share be allocated to each widow and to each orphan of every soldier killed in the raid. Whether he did this because of the memory of his own mother’s predicament when the Tatars killed his father, or for more political purposes, it had a profound effect. This policy not only ensured him of the support of the poorest people in the tribe, but it also inspired loyalty among his soldiers, who knew that even if they died, he would take care of their surviving families.
Did Saddam borrow this from Genghis Khan or what?



In traditional steppe systems of thought, everyone outside the kinship network was an enemy and would always be an enemy unless somehow brought into the family through ties of adoption or marriage. Temujin sought an end to the constant fighting between such groups, and he wanted to deal with the Tatars the same way that he had dealt with the Jurkin and the Tayichiud clans—kill the leaders and absorb the survivors and all their goods and animals into his tribe.
Another brilliant move at expanding his base and followers!



the Mongols took in so many Tatars, many of whom rose to high office and great prominence in the Mongol Empire, that the name Tatar became synonymous with, and in many cases better known, than the name Mongol, leading to much historic confusion through the centuries.
It seems Assyrians are not the only one with a confusing history, and all he naming issues etc. this one seems worse...



He allowed fathers and sons and brothers and cousins to stay together when practical, but by forcing them into new units that no man could desert or change, under penalty of death, he broke the power of the old-system lineages, clans, tribes, and ethnic identities
Another one of his brilliant invention that would ensure loyalty.



The entire Mongol tribe became integrated by means of the army. Under this new system, all members of the tribe—regardless of age or gender—had to perform a certain amount of public service. If they could not serve in the military, they were obliged to give the equivalent of one day of work per week for public projects and service to the khan. This included caring for the warriors’ herds, gathering dung for fuel, cooking, making felt, repairing weapons, or even singing and entertaining the troops. In the new organization, all people belonged to the same bone. Temujin the boy, who had faced repeated rejections ascribed to his lower-status birth, had now abolished the distinction between black bone and white bone. All of his followers were now one united people.
Talk about creating absolute unity and purpose!


Even as Temujin consolidated his rule over his greatly enlarged following, he would confront yet another great challenge that would put his new system to a decisive test. His next move would drive his lifelong rival Jamuka into an alliance with his ritual father Ong Khan to combat Temujin’s growing might and popularity.
This is the fact of life in the Mongolian tribes: anyone could turn against you, you just never know! In this case, this was an alliance between his former best friend together with his spiritual adviser (and one of his late father's best friends)


Ong Khan, while generally siding with Temujin, had continued to play the two subordinate khans off against one another.
As brilliant as GK as in reading people and knowing who to trust from an early age, he missed this one! He always trusted Ong Khan as his spiritual adviser and a second father, it turned out he was playing him in secret and pitting him against his childhood friend Jamuka!
 
Last edited:
Exhausted and without provisions after days of constant flight, Temujin reached the distant shores of muddy Lake Baljuna. He looked around him to see how many men had survived the flight. He counted only nineteen of his men, and they now faced the possibility of starvation in this remote exile.

As they paused to recuperate by the waters of Baljuna and decide what to do, a wild horse unexpectedly appeared from the north, and Temujin’s brother Khasar set out in pursuit of it. He brought the horse down, and the men quickly skinned it. Without flaming wood over which to roast meat or pots in which to boil it, they relied on their ancient cooking technique. After skinning the horse, they cut up the meat and made a large bag from the horsehide into which they put the meat and some water. They gathered dried dung to make a fire, but they could not put the hide kettle directly on the fire. Instead, they heated rocks in the fire until glowing hot, then they dropped the hot rocks into the mixture of meat and water. The rocks heated the water, but the water prevented the rocks from burning through the bag. After a few hours, the starving men feasted on boiled horseflesh.

Aside from Khasar, the men gathered with him were his friends, not his relatives. Some of his family members were temporarily temporarily lost on the steppe, but other relatives had deserted Temujin to join Ong Khan or Jamuka. In particular his uncle, one of his father’s two brothers who had helped him to kidnap Temujin’s mother from her Merkid husband, had joined Ong Khan against his own nephew. With little to comfort them or offer encouragement for the future, the exhausted men seized upon the appearance of the horse as a supernatural gift that offered them more than just food for their empty bellies. As the most important and honored animal in the Mongol world, the horse solemnized the occasion and served as a sign of divine intervention and support. The horse symbolized the power of Temujin’s destiny, and its sacrifice, as before any major battle or khuriltai, not only fed the men, but further empowered Temujin’s Spirit Banner. With only the muddy water of Baljuna to drink at the end of the horseflesh meal, Temujin Khan raised one hand to the sky, and with the other he held up the muddy water of Baljuna in a toast. He thanked his men for their loyalty and swore never to forget it.

The men shared in drinking the muddy waters and swore eternal allegiance to him. In the retelling of the episode in oral history, it became known in history as the Baljuna Covenant, and acquired a mythic aura as the lowest point in the military fortunes of Temujin Khan but also as the event out of which the identity and form of the Mongol Empire would arise. The event acquired a symbolic representation of the diversity of the Mongol people based on mutual commitment and loyalty that transcended kinship, ethnicity, and religion. The nineteen men with Temujin Khan came from nine different tribes; probably only Temujin and his brother Khasar were actually from the Mongol clans. The others included Merkid, Khitan, and Kereyid. Whereas Temujin was a devout shamanist who worshiped the Eternal Blue Sky and the God Mountain of Burkhan Khaldun, the nineteen included several Christians, three Muslims, and several Buddhists. They were united only in their devotion to Temujin and their oath to him and each other. The oaths sworn at Baljuna created a type of brotherhood, and in transcending kinship, ethnicity, and religion.
If there is one part of the book that symbolises GK's life, his early challenges and his constant willingness to survive and come out stronger, it is this episode above. Almost mythical, assuming it did indeed happen. It seems like just when we thought GK had gotten rid of all of his enemies and unified all the Mongol tribes, clans and families, something or someone else was to come in his way! It never ends in the Mongol steppe. You either kill or get killed, not much different from wild animals in a jungle, and i am not saying this in a mocking way but a matter of fact based on all we have read so far.
 
Propaganda and control of public opinion were quickly emerging as Temujin’s primary weapons of choice.
While this is nothing new, with all major ancient empires having done it, it is interesting that he also employed the 'Control of Public Opinion'!


There was no group left where Jamuka might find refuge, and his end would come with a slow whimper, not with a climactic final struggle. In 1205, the Year of the Ox, a year after the victory over the Naiman, Jamuka’s followers, desperate and resigned to defeat, seized him and delivered him to Temujin. Despite the animosity between the two men, Temujin valued loyalty above all else. Rather than reward the men who brought Jamuka to him, Temujin had all of them executed in front of the leader whom they had betrayed.
Jamuka is no longer a threat, after decades of rivalry.



Jamuka had been Temujin’s first rival, and now he ended his life as the last of the Mongol aristocrats opposing him. In Temujin’s long quest for control of the Mongol clans, Temujin had defeated every tribe on the steppe and removed the threat of every aristocratic lineage by killing off their men and marrying their women to his sons and other
Summarizing how Temujin came to rule Mongolia! But is he done from his enemies, or in typical Mongol fashion, some will pop out from nowhere, to challenge him and his leadership once again. We will find out!



Temujin now ranked as undisputed ruler of a vast land, controlling everything from the Gobi in the south to the Arctic tundra in the north, from the Manchurian forests in the east to the Altai Mountains of the west. His empire was grass and contained far more animals than humans.
His rule and full authority is finally legit and with no disputed rivals! No more Jamuka, Ong Khan, Jurkins,Tayichiuds , Merkids, Tatars. He had defeated them all. He was now the undisputed survivor of Mongolia's survival of the fittest! And given the harsh reality of living and fending for yourself back then in Mongolia's harsh steppe, you must be really really really good at not only survival, but being a great warrior, leading a legendary army!
 
With all the nomadic tribes united and Genghis Khan securely ensconced as their ruler, it seemed uncertain what should happen next. He had spent so many years locked into the drama with Jamuka and Ong Khan that without them, his large tribe seemed to lack an objective or purpose. Without enemies, they lacked a reason to hold together. Genghis Khan seemed to be searching for new ones, but he found no tribe worthy of the distinction. With no other potential targets, in 1207 he sent his eldest son, twenty-eight-year-old Jochi, and his tumen on a campaign into the area the Mongols called Sibir,
This is the point where the Mongols started their military adventures and invasions. Of course, they started small....
 
Genghis Khan commanded a great army but presided over a largely impoverished people,
As we know, this is a recipe for either disaster or grand goals, where you have the power to invade others and take over their resources and wealth...



Genghis Khan placed no trust in the Jurched. The Mongols had much closer ethnic and linguistic affinity with the Khitan, whom the Jurched had defeated and now dominated. Sensing the power of the new Mongol ruler, many Khitan had fled from Jurched territory to find sanctuary under Genghis Khan. In 1208, four high court officials deserted to the Mongols and urged them to attack the Jurched, but, fearful of a trap or some other nefarious scheme, Genghis Khan refused.
‘I was not the author of this trouble; grant me strength to exact vengeance.’ Thereupon he descended from the hill, meditating action and making ready for war.”
Two example showing GK wasn't all that crazy and bloodthirsty . He actually used reason and logic, at least sometimes.



On and off the battlefield, the Mongol warrior was forbidden to speak of death, injury, or defeat. Just to think of it might make it happen.
Talk about believing in manifesting and affirmations, concepts highly popularised of late with books like "The Secret" and Abraham Hicks, and other "New Age" movement theories!
 
He tried to teach them that the first key to leadership was self-control, particularly the master of pride, which was something more difficult, he explained, to subdue than a wild lion, and anger, which was more difficult than to defeat than the greatest wrestler"

"If you can't swallow your pride, you can't lead"
"Without the vision of a goal, a man can't manage his own, much less the lives of others"
We see true leadership wisdom and logic here. The importance of having goals and vision was important even back then.



In one of his most important lessons, he told his sons that conquering an army is not the same as conquering a nation. You may conquer an army with superior tactics and men, but you can conquer a nation only by conquering the hearts of the people
Another great example to show that there was a lot more to GK than what we hear in history books and the bloodshed his empire and army invasions caused for over a century. He was a real politician and tactician and not just a brilliant military leader. You have to give credit where credit is due.


Genghis Khan kept his immediate focus on the Khwarizm campaign; but once finished with it, he turned back toward the Tangut. As he again moved his army south, he almost certainly had plans for yet one more major campaign in which the Tangut war would only be an opening move. He probably intended to secure a base in the Tangut kingdom and then move on south toward the final goal of the Sung dynasty, a prize that had eluded the army he had left fighting in northern China when he invaded Khwarizm.

During the winter of 1226–1227, while en route across the Gobi to make war on the Tangut, Genghis Khan paused to hunt wild horses. He rode a reddish gray horse that shied when the wild horses charged him, and the skittish horse threw the Great Khan to the ground. Despite internal injuries, a raging fever, and the concerned advice of his wife Yesui, Genghis Khan refused to return home and instead pressed on with the Tangut campaign. Although his health never recovered after the fall, he continued the campaign against the Tangut king, whose name, by an odd coincidence, was Burkhan, which meant “god,” as in the sacred mountain Burkhan Khaldun.

The name was so sacred to Genghis Khan that once he defeated the Tangut, he ordered that the king’s name be changed before he was executed. Six months later and only a few days before the final victory over the Tangut, Genghis Khan died.
Genghis Khan had finally run out of spirits. All these close calls with death never materialised, and it took a fall from a horse for his death! Although, there are many different theories as to how he really died, including an an enemy arrow, poisoning, natural death etc.
 
Last edited:
Post Genghis Khan Mongolia

If the Mongol Empire were to survive, Ogodei (the new Mongol Khan, taking over from his dad) had to take them to war against a new target, one that had not yet been looted. But which and where?
Just like today, war is sometimes fought to revive an economy! The Mongols did it back then, and we hear it now too, as a way to revive the U.S economy when it is in a recession or depression.


When the Mongols veered south from Hungary toward the Balkans and thereby failed to ride on Cologne, the clerics deducted that if the Mongols were not searching for the bones of the Three Kings, perhaps the invaders were exiled Jews who had failed to return home from the Babylonian captivity.
The Mongols had now made it all the way to Europe, some 4,000 KMs away from Mongolia! The passage above is amazing in its historical context: somehow, the Jews were linked to this whole thing without their fault! Easy target, just like they have have been before and since!



Despite the extensive spiritual beliefs that the Mongols and Europeans shared in common, the opening relationship had been so negative and misguided that in future years, the entire base of shared religion would eventually erode. The Mongols continued for another generation to foster closer relations with Christian Europe, but in the end, they would have to abandon all such hope, and with it they would, in time, abandon Christianity entirely in favor of Buddhism and Islam.
It is argued that European Catholicism is one big reason why Mongols moved away from Christianity!
 
As part of his more Western orientation, Christianity temporarily resumed its ascendancy in Mongke’s court, a trend reinforced by the large number of Christian wives in the Golden Family and by the steadfast loyalty shown by Christian nations such as Georgia and Armenia.

Near the end of 1253, the Year of the Ox, William of Rubruck, a Franciscan monk, came to the Mongol court as an envoy from the French king. From his writings, an intriguing, although not always detailed, description emerged of the rivalries among the Christians and other religions in the Mongol court. Rubruck had the opportunity to see how the Mongol court celebrated Christmas, although he himself had little role to play other than singing “Veni Sancte Spiritus” for them.

Mongke Khan and his wife celebrated mass in church, with the two of them seated on a golden couch across from the altar. In keeping with Assyrian Christian tradition, the inside was void of excessive decoration and imagery, but the rafters of the church were draped with silk to give the building the feeling and appearance of a Mongol ger. After mass, the khan talked about religion for a short while with the priests. When he left, his wife stayed behind to distribute Christmas presents to everyone. She offered gifts of textiles to Rubruck, but he refused to accept them. Apparently the khatun did not notice the intended slight since Rubruck’s interpreter accepted the cloth for himself and later sold it back in Cyprus.
Nice to see this reference to the Assyrian Church of the East to which Mongke Khan's wife (grandson of Genghis Khan) belonged!



Despite the common religion, Rubruck greatly resented the Assyrian, Armenian, and Orthodox Christians at the Mongol court. Since he considered all non-Catholics to be heretics, he contemptuously designated the Mongol congregants of the Assyrian Church as Nestorians in reference to Nestorius, the fifth-century Patriarch of Constantinople who was condemned as a heretic by the Council of Ephesus in 431. Among the Assyrian beliefs that Rubruck held to be heretical was that the Virgin Mary was the mother of Christ, but not the mother of God. They also differed from the Catholics in their steadfast refusal to portray Christ on the cross as a violation of the Mongol taboos on depicting death or blood.
As you can see, European Catholicism's disdain and plain hate for Assyrian and Eastern Christianity in general was very evident and early on. It is no surprise that a few centuries later, they would use Assyrians (under a new re-invented Chaldean identity) to split the Assyrian nation and church.


Even when they admitted to being Christians, Mongols did not consider their religion as their primary identification. As one of the Mongol generals who was a follower of Christianity explained, he was no Christian—he was a Mongol.
Sounds like a typical Assyrian nationalist who always plays Assyrianism ahead of Christianity, if they even adhere to the religion to begin with!
 
Last edited:
After more than 4 year hiatus, we are back....

On the fall of Baghdad
In classic Mongol diplomacy, before mounting an attack on the Caliph, Hulegu sent envoys with a list of legal grievances against him. Hulegu accused the Caliph of not sending an army to assist in the suppression of the Ismaili Assassin sect, even though he had once sworn allegiance to Genghis Khan. In Mongol eyes, the Caliph was as much a rebellious vassal as the Imam, and he possibly faced the same fate. If the Caliph did not immediately atone for his misdeeds by surrendering to Mongol rule, Hulegu threatened to conquer his city and capture him. The Caliph seemed as incapable of understanding the danger of the Mongols as the Imam had been, and scoffed at what he felt were the Mongols’ preposterous demands. He defiantly announced that the entire Muslim world would rise up to defend the independence of the Caliph and that they would not permit an infidel nation to occupy the Arab capital of Baghdad. He swore that Muslims as far away as the Maghreb along the Atlantic coast of Morocco, would rush to kill the Mongol invaders if they continued in their campaign. Neither God nor the
Muslim people, he defiantly claimed, would allow Baghdad to fall into the hands of nonbelievers.

Before commencing the attack, Hulegu sought to exploit political, religious, and ethnic divisions within Baghdad by forging secret ties to the Christians within the city. Because his mother and his two wives were Christians, as well as many of his own men, Hulegu cultivated contacts and nourished respect within the Christian communities across the Middle East, and he had maintained good relations with his Christian vassal kingdoms, Georgia and Armenia. Taking advantage of these connections, Christian envoys secretly slipped back and forth between the city and the Mongol camp, bringing vital reconnaissance to Hulegu and carrying back promises of special treatment to the Christians and other minorities in the city.

The Caliph also tried to use to his own benefit the close ties of the Mongols and the Christians. He summoned the Catholikos Makikha, the patriarch of the Christian church, and dispatched him and a Muslim minister to negotiate with the Mongols. He offered to make a formal submission, pay enormous tribute, and to read Friday prayers in the mosque in the name of the Great Khan, thereby officially acknowledging his subservience to Mongol rule. Hulegu scoffed at the offer. He knew that he was already too close to victory to settle for such trifles—not when all the wealth of the richest city on earth could easily be his.
 
Last edited:
The lands ruled by Hulegu and his descendants from Afghanistan to Turkey became known as the Ilkhanate, meaning “vassal empire.” It was here that Persian culture reemerged from centuries of Arab domination to build the foundation for modern Iran.
 
On the founding of Beijing as a city

In 1272, Khubilai ordered the building of his new capital, and he connected it by canal to the Yellow River. The Mongols called the place Khanbalik, the City of the Khan. His Chinese subjects called it Dadu, the Great Capital, and it grew into the modern capital of Beijing.
 
Mongols' approach to Christianity and Catholicism in Europe,

Again in 1269, when the Polo brothers, Maffeo and Nicolo, returned from their first trip to Asia, they brought a request from Khubilai Khan to the pope to send the Mongols one hundred priests, that they might share their knowledge with the Mongol court. With the tremendous emphasis on religious freedom throughout the Mongol Empire, Rabban Bar Sawma was surprised when he arrived in Europe and found that only a single religion was tolerated. He found particularly amazing that the religious leaders had so much political power over nations as well as more mundane powers over the everyday lives of the common people. As a Christian himself, he was delighted with the monopoly that his religion exercised, but it presented a stark contrast to the Mongol Empire where many religions flourished but had the obligation to serve the needs of the empire before their own.

Despite the publicity of his visit and the cordial reception across Europe, Rabban Bar Sawma fared no better in his mission than the other unacknowledged envoys; he failed to secure treaties with a single one of the European monarchs or church officials. His only success was that he managed to get a commitment from the pope to send teachers to the Mongol court as Khubilai had requested several times already. Failing in his diplomatic mission, Rabban Bar Sawma returned to the court of the Ilkhan in Persia, and related the events of his travels that were copied down in Syriac as The History of the Life and Travels of Rabban Swama, Envoy and Plenipotentiary of the Mongol Khans to the Kings of Europe.

The trip of Rabban Bar Sawma, and particularly his serving communion to the king of England and personally receiving communion from the hands of the pope, illustrates how much the Mongols had changed the world in the fifty years since their army invaded Europe. Civilizations that had once been separate worlds unto themselves and largely unknown to one another, had become part of a single intercontinental system of communication, commerce, technology, and politics. Instead of sending mounted warriors and fearsome siege engines, the Mongols now dispatched humble priests, scholars, and ambassadors. The time of Mongol conquests had ended, but the era of the Mongol Peace was only beginning.
 
Despite the initial reliance of commerce on routes created through military conquest, it soon became obvious that whereas armies moved quickest by horse across land, massive quantities of goods moved best by water. Mongols expanded and lengthened the Grand Canal that already connected the Yellow and Yangtze Rivers to transport grain and other agricultural products farther and more efficiently into the northern districts. Adapting Chinese engineering and technology to new environments, they built water projects throughout their territories. In Yunnan, the Mongol governor created a dozen dams and reservoirs with connecting canals that survived until modern times. The failed invasions of Japan and Java taught the Mongols much about shipbuilding, and when their military efforts failed, they turned that knowledge to peaceful pursuits of commerce.
It is great to see how the Mongols used past military failure as a way to learn, adapt and get better.
 
The opening of new trade routes, combined with the widespread destruction of manufacturing in Persia and Iraq by the Mongol invasions, created new opportunities for Chinese manufacturing. The Mongol conquest of China had been far less disruptive than the military campaigns in the Middle East, and Khubilai pressed for the expansion of traditional Chinese wares into these markets as well as the widespread transfer of Muslim and Indian technology to China. Through their shares, the members of the Mongol royal family controlled much of the production throughout Eurasia, but they depended on the merchant class to transport and sell these wares. Mongols had turned from warriors into shareholders, but they had no skill or apparent desire to become merchants themselves.
To think about it, China owes its past and present success as a nation to the Mongols.
 
In conquering their empire, not only had the Mongols revolutionized warfare, they also created the nucleus of a universal culture and world system. This new global culture continued to grow long after the demise of the Mongol Empire, and through continued development over the coming centuries, it became the foundation for the modern world system with the original Mongol emphases on free commerce, open communication, shared knowledge, secular politics, religious coexistence, international law, and diplomatic immunity. Although never ruled by the Mongols, in many ways Europe gained the most from their world system. The Europeans received all the benefits of trade, technology transfer, and the Global Awakening without paying the cost of Mongol conquest.

Under the widespread influences from the paper and printing, gunpowder and firearms, and the spread of the navigational compass and other maritime equipment, Europeans experienced a Renaissance, literally a rebirth, but it was not the ancient world of Greece and Rome being reborn: It was the Mongol Empire, picked up, transferred, and adapted by the Europeans to their own needs and culture.

In May 1288, soon after meeting with Rabban Bar Sawma and receiving a letter and gifts from the Mongol court, Pope Nicholas IV issued a papal bull calling for construction of a new mother church at Assisi for his Franciscan order. As the first Franciscan pope, Nicholas IV, together with his fellow Franciscans, seemingly wanted to proclaim the coming of age of their order. For this project, they wanted imagery that not only proclaimed their new status but highlighted the accomplishments of the order. The Franciscans had the closest ties of any Europe group to the Mongol court. Among others, the monks in the delegation of Plano di Carpini, who had served as the first envoy to the Mongols at the time of Guyuk’s election as Great Khan, and William of Rubruck, who visited in the time of Mongke Khan’s installation, had all been Franciscans. The artists borrowed themes and techniques from the Chinese and Persian art brought in by the Mongols, quite possibly from the gifts brought by Rabban Bar Swama himself.

Interesting to see that Europe, geographically far from the Mongols, also benefits from their conquests and military pressure as the Mongol destruction of the Islamic caliphates in the Middle East inadvertently weakened Europe’s traditional rivals and opened up direct diplomatic channels to the Far East.
 
On the deadly plague of the middle ages
According to the most plausible, but not completely verifiable, accounts, the disease originated in the south of China, and Mongol warriors brought it north with them.

By 1351, China had reportedly lost between one-half and two-thirds of its population to the plague.
Imagine how much bigger their current 1.4 billion population would be if the plagues didn't happen?

China functioned as the manufacturing center of the Mongol World System, and as the goods poured out of China, the disease followed, seemingly
spreading in all directions at once.
Exactly as would happen nearly 700 years later with Covid, which originated in Wuhan, China! Oh how history repeats, even after this many years, decades and centuries....

With or without human intention, the disease was already spreading and would continue to do so. When the Genovese and other refugees fled the port by boat, they took the disease with them to Constantinople, from where it easily spread to Cairo in Egypt and to Messina in Sicily.
Even without airplanes or fast modern way of travel, the plague still spread fast and wide....

In the sixty years from 1340 until 1400, according to some estimates, the population of Africa declined from 80 million to 68 million inhabitants, and Asia from 238 million to 201 million. The total world population—including the Americas, where the plague did not strike for another two centuries—fell from approximately 450 million to between 350 and 375 million inhabitants, a net loss of at least 75 million, or more than a million people a year for the remainder of the fourteenth century.

Deprived of their two advantages of military strength and commercial lucre, the Mongols in Russia, central Asia, Persia, and the Middle East searched for new modes of power and legitimacy by intermarrying with their subjects and consciously becoming more like them in language, religion, and culture. Mongol authorities purged the remaining elements of shamanism, Buddhism, and Christianity from their families and strengthened their commitment to Islam, which was the primary religion of their subjects, or, in the case of the Golden Horde in Russia, the religion of the Turkic army that helped keep the family in power.
Talk about a huge turning point and a break for Islam, after earlier being decimated by those same Mongols.
 
Sudden Collapse of the Mongols.

At the least sign of weakness in the Mongol administration, confidence in the paper currency dropped and caused it to fall in value while pushing up the value of copper and silver. Inflation grew so fiercely that by 1356 the paper currency had effectively become worthless.
At the least sign of weakness in the Mongol administration, confidence in the paper currency dropped and caused it to fall in value while pushing up the value of copper and silver. Inflation grew so fiercely that by 1356 the paper currency had effectively become worthless.
subjects. In China, the Great Khan Togoon Tumur and some sixty thousand Mongols managed to escape the Ming rebels, but they left behind approximately four hundred thousand who were captured and killed or absorbed by the Chinese. Those that managed to return to Mongolia resumed their nomadic way of pastoralism, almost as if the entire Chinese episode from 1211 until 1368 had been merely an extended stay at their southern summer camp.
All this nation and empire building of over 150 years, all came to an abrupt end.


During such an extended interaction, the Mongols and their Turkic allies amalgamated with each other into several different ethnic groups of Turco-Mongols that maintained a separate identity from one another as well as from the larger Slavic society.
This is likely the pivotal moment the Turkic/Ottomans started to rise to power, on the back of their Mongol allies and cousins.


In one country after another, indigenous rebellions expelled the Mongols and local elites took the reins of government. While Korea, Russia, and China returned to the hands of native dynasties, the Muslim territories experienced a more complex transition from Mongol rule. Instead of returning to the control of Arabs who had been the traders, the intermediaries, the bankers, the shippers, and the caravan drivers who connected Asia and Europe, a new cultural hybrid emerged that combined a Turco-Mongol military system with the legal institutions of Islam and the ancient cultural traditions of Persia. The eastern part of the Muslim world had found a new cultural freedom in which they could still be Muslims but without the domination of Arabs, whom they never allowed to regain power. New dynasties, such as the Ottoman of Turkey, the Safavid of Persia, and the Moghul of India, sometimes called Gunpowder Empires, relied primarily on the vast innovations in Mongol weaponry...

Despite the plague and collapse of the commercial system, revolts, and the subsequent dismemberment of the Mongol Empire, even the rebels seemed reluctant to let the old empire go completely. The new rulers hung on to the trappings and illusions of the old system to legitimize their own new rule. The facade of the Mongol Empire continued standing long after the internal structure had collapsed and the Mongols were all gone.
This is often the case with strong empires: even after collapse, they leave their mark and millennia to come; hence the Assyrians.
 
By the end of the fourteenth century, the Mongol holdings in central Asia had fallen under the control of Timur, also known as Timur the Lame or Tamerlane, a Turkic warrior who claimed, with flimsy evidence, descent from Genghis Khan.

Just as the Mongols made China into the most productive manufacturing and trading center of their era, the Moghuls made India into the world’s greatest manufacturing and trading nation and—contrary to both Muslim and Hindu traditions—raised the status of women.
 
An interesting link to America:

With so many empires striving to maintain the illusion of the Mongol Empire in everything from politics to art, public opinion seemed obstinately unwilling to believe that it no longer existed. Nowhere was the belief in the empire longer lasting or more important than in Europe, where, in 1492, more than a century after the last khan ruled over China, Christopher Columbus convinced the monarchs Isabella and Ferdinand that he could reestablish sea contact and revive the lost commerce with the Mongol court of the Great Khan. With the breakup of the Mongol communication system, the Europeans had not heard about the fall of the empire and the overthrow of the Great Khan. Columbus, therefore, insisted that although the Muslims barred the land route from Europe to the Mongol court, he could sail west from Europe across the World Ocean and and arrive in the land described by Marco Polo.


Columbus embarked on his voyage to find the Mongols while carrying with him a printed copy of Marco Polo’s travels, into which he had jotted
copious notes and observations for his planned arrival at their court. For Columbus, Marco Polo was not merely an inspiration but also a practical guide. When he reached Cuba after visiting several smaller islands, Columbus believed that he was on the edge of the Great Khan’s realm and would soon find the Mongol kingdom of Cathay. Columbus remained convinced that the lands of the khan lay only a little farther to the north within what we today recognize as the mainland of the United States. Since he had not found the land of the Great Khan of the Mongols, he decided that the people he met must be the southern neighbors of the Mongols in India, and thus Columbus called the native people of the Americas Indians, the name by which they have been known ever since.
-One of history's greatest errors that never got corrected. Imaging someone sailing to a land, where he is met with great warriors, national builders and meticulous record keepers, and then mistakenly thinking he had run into the ancient Assyrians and calling them by that name for good, even if they have no relation to the ancient empire whatsoever. That is exactly what happened here.
 

Reflection: The Mongol Legacy and the Modern World - final thoughts
​

Reading through the pages of this book and the notes I made on my Kindle, I am struck by how much of our "modern" world-from global trade and diplomatic immunity to the spread of technology-actually stems from the Mongol Empire rather than just the Renaissance of Greece and Rome. It’s fascinating that Europe, geographically distant from the heart of the conquests, ended up benefiting the most from the transfer of Chinese inventions like gunpowder, the compass, and the printing press.

A particularly compelling point in the notes is the presence of Assyrian Christianity within the Mongol court. Weatherford (the book author) mentions that the Mongols were exposed to an "Assyrian Christian tradition" that favored simple interiors. This is a powerful testament to Assyrian continuity; centuries after the fall of the Neo-Assyrian Empire in 612 BC, Assyrians were not only surviving but were influential enough to have their "Assyrian rite" priests, like Rabban Bar Sawma, acting as high-level diplomats for the Mongol Khans in Europe. It is like just when you needed more evidence in Nineveh and the surrounding areas of Mesopotamia to the continuity of Assyrians, comes an evidence from far away!

While the ancient Assyrian Empire was often remembered for its military might and administrative innovations, its people's cultural and religious identity persisted through the ages, finding a unique place within the next great world-spanning empire. Just as the Mongols transformed from warriors into "shareholders" of a global commercial system, the Assyrians transitioned from imperial rulers to the intellectual and spiritual conduits of the Silk Road. Ultimately, the Mongol Empire didn't just conquer land; it acted as a giant "filter" that picked up cultures-including the resilient Assyrian tradition-and redistributed them, creating the interconnected global society we live in today.

Based on this alone, call me crazy, but if the two empires co-existed, and while they would be at war with each other, at the end they would probably co-exist fine, if not for their common interest in such domains as warfare, commerce, record keeping etc, it would be through the modern concept of MAD - Mutually Assured Destruction. Something that came to rule the relationship between a nuclear U.S and even more nuclear U.S.S.R.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top