I am currently reading a fascinating book about Genghis Khan and the Mongolian empire called ‘Genghis Khan and the making of the modern world’ by Jack Weatherford.
I am more than half way done and hope to finish the book in 2 weeks or so. In fact, the book has been so good to read, I sometimes could go for over 1-2 hours reading it and don’t want to put it down (Kindle version)
I have been making notes throughout, and I hope to share some of it here and try to make comparisons with the Assyrian empire and their rule.
But for now, I just have to note that despite their amazing strength and speed with which they took over half of Asia and some parts of Europe, their dominance only lasted around a century or so (1206-1294) which when compared to the dominance of the Assyrian empire is like a blip on the radar. Assyrian history as a dominant empire is so long that it is divided its into three distinct periods, starting from the Bronze Age and all the way to the Neo-Assyrian period until the fall of the empire in 612 B.C.
It is also important to note, while I will try to make some general comparisons and contrast between the two empires, it is a futile attempt to answer the question of "who is stronger" or "who would win in a battle" : this is similar to another popular debate we often hear in soccer (Pele vs. Messi) or in basketball (Jordan vs. Bryant) where you are comparing players and systems from two very different eras. But it is even harder to compare these two empires, since they are separate by clsoe to 2 millenniums (Assyrian empire fell in 612 B.C while the Mongol empire rose to prominence in 1220 A.D) . But it is understandable that such comparisons can be fun, especially for history and ancient military enthusiasts.

I am more than half way done and hope to finish the book in 2 weeks or so. In fact, the book has been so good to read, I sometimes could go for over 1-2 hours reading it and don’t want to put it down (Kindle version)
I have been making notes throughout, and I hope to share some of it here and try to make comparisons with the Assyrian empire and their rule.
But for now, I just have to note that despite their amazing strength and speed with which they took over half of Asia and some parts of Europe, their dominance only lasted around a century or so (1206-1294) which when compared to the dominance of the Assyrian empire is like a blip on the radar. Assyrian history as a dominant empire is so long that it is divided its into three distinct periods, starting from the Bronze Age and all the way to the Neo-Assyrian period until the fall of the empire in 612 B.C.
It is also important to note, while I will try to make some general comparisons and contrast between the two empires, it is a futile attempt to answer the question of "who is stronger" or "who would win in a battle" : this is similar to another popular debate we often hear in soccer (Pele vs. Messi) or in basketball (Jordan vs. Bryant) where you are comparing players and systems from two very different eras. But it is even harder to compare these two empires, since they are separate by clsoe to 2 millenniums (Assyrian empire fell in 612 B.C while the Mongol empire rose to prominence in 1220 A.D) . But it is understandable that such comparisons can be fun, especially for history and ancient military enthusiasts.

Last edited: